Monday, January 25, 2010

Module 2- TASK ONE: Curriculum Design

Hello! I hope everyone is doing well and making good progress with their blogs! I wanted to blog as I went through the articles and "food for thought" questions.

After I read Beyond the Lesson by Applebee I first thought about: Why do we need to consider curriculum? I really like in the article how Applebee breaks down though processes. So, think about writing. We all love to write and read others writings, but when we are teaching writing there needs to be some type of framework in which is followed. Which applies when thinking about any area: reading, math, social studies, science... That's when you start to answer the question, why do we need to consider curriculum? As educators there needs to be a purpose behind what we are doing and why we are doing it. We need a framework to follow (standards and indicators) and guidelines need to be established so that we are accountable at our individual levels. Accountable because we want our students to be prepared for the next step. So as we consider curriculum we start to analyze lists, documents, studies, and so forth to ensure that we are teaching our students what they need to establish the frame work, repetition, teach, reteach, so that they are give the tools they need to be successful as they journey from one level to the next.

In developing curriculum we then establish a guideline that should be followed from one year to the next. We can then build on the curriculum, borrow from others, add and delete what works and does not work. As most teacher, I need a framework or plan and the curriculum is the plan that we follow to ensure that we are meeting the necessity of every area in which we teach- "Effective Conversations" in our everyday speech!

Next I thought about: What model of curriculum best fits my current role? What model I am most attracted to? and What would be my preference? I really had to think about this question and what it was asking- I am still a little hesitant in the way that I answer. When it asks what model, I kept going back to the open vs. closed conversation model. This clearly addresses how my classroom is structured. I strongly prefer the open discussion model. I am one that wants that cooperative learning to take place (being a special educator) - In saying that, I know that an open conversation setting is what I see as ideal and the most optimal learning environment. In reality, I know that is not always the case. There are times when I have to lead my classroom as a closed setting (me being the higher) and the students (being the lower). It has to be that way when we are working on key skills, that they need practice and repetition to learn and be successful in that skill. But, being a special education teacher I have the luxury of co-teaching. So I can be a part of the closed conversation in the general education classroom and then provide an open conversation in my classroom to help students relate to one another, to me as a resource, almost in terms of an open forum and relating to real work experiences.

As I stated earlier I hesitated in answering this question when talking about what model because as I mentioned I prefer the open conversation but I don't think that answers the entire question about what model I prefer. I also feel that the Episodic curriculum and from the next article by Wraga the intagrative core curriculum is a part of what I prefer and the second answer to that question or series of questions. In the episodic curriculum, I really teach according to elements being ordered and still related to the central idea and focus. Which also applies to the intagrative approach- related one subject area to another and then in turn making it meaningful for students by relating to real life experiences. So bringing that all together I love the idea and would prefer to teach in an open conversation with a episodic/intagrative core curriculum!

Finally- What is a modern curriculum and what could this look like? First let me mention that I really like the statement at the beginning of the article that reminds us that students cannot possibly learn everything that they need to before they enter into the real world. That really hits home for me- I want to teach my students so much and as we all know in such little time. But, I must remind myself that it's about quality and not quantity and I only have these students for one year ( I am one year of their educational success) and that I teach with wonderful colleagues that will instill that in them from my year to their next and so forth! So what do I think modern curriculum could look like? "Knowledge is power"- modern curriculum asks students who they are and who they want to be. Modern curriculum is hands on work of knowledge that can produce students who want to learn and form their own opinion and conversations. I think that modern curriculum could one day look like a "ideal classroom"- A classroom that invites open communication, past experiences, hands on activities that create optimal learning of new skills, in an episodic manner that allows purpose and meaning behind what is a students "Core curriculum"-

8 comments:

  1. I think that you are correct that the majority of us would view the open conversation model with cooperative learning as the ideal model for our classrooms. I also believe that many of us are optimistic idealists by nature based on the profession that we have chosen. It's frustrating at times that what we envision for our classrooms and what reality dictates are very different. I am curious if your special ed students receive core content instruction in the regular classroom or in a targeted assistance environment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rhonda-
    I do a lot of team teaching with my teachers! So, the majority of the core content is taught in the general education classroom (which is what we aim for) by myself and the classroom teacher. Then, the follow up in my classroom; is on occasion teaching core, but the majority of the time it is review of skills, teaching and re-teaching to meet each individual need.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lesley- first I want to thank you for your very careful and thorough consideration of these questions of curriculum. I think you have highlighted the issues we have around curriculum. I agree that curriculum should be seen as a framework. I like to think of it as a road map--without one how would we know where we are going. That said- the model of curriculum that we subscribe to can be shifting according to the need of our students- I like what you said about sometimes subscribing to an open model but other times needing a closed system depending on the need. That said- I really like Rhonda's comment about curriculum in the ideal state vs. what really happens in our classroom. Is is possible to adhere to a curriculum in both the ideal state and reality or is this an impossibility? If it is impossible why do we bother to have one in the first place?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for reminding me that quality is better than quality. I read about that in the article but reading your response really called it to my attention. I only get small groups of kids for very few minutes a day, so I constantly feel like I am cramming facts down their throats. Hopefully I can remember this more when working with the groups and not feel so panicked to cover more ground. I also agree with the ideal situation for curriculum. Wouldn’t it be nice if it were as easy as writing it down on paper?

    ReplyDelete
  5. "We need a framework to follow (standards and indicators) and guidelines need to be established so that we are accountable at our individual levels. Accountable because we want our students to be prepared for the next step."
    Above is what you stated and it is funny becasue I discussed almost the same thing. :) I very often question curriculum and the design of it, but no matter how we look at it, I do think that it is a framework for how we teach and it keeps us on track as teachers. Ensuring taht we are all on the same level and teaching the necessiary material. We are accountable for teaching the inforamtion and the students are also held accountable. What we teach them and what they learn allows them to be prepared for the next grade level and subject matter. :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for your input and comments- Dana and Heidi it is all about putting things into perspective. I think a comment to you two and to answer Dr. Clarke, Is it possible to adhere to curriculum in both the ideal state and reality? For me, that is a definite yes! The curriculum that is "Suppose" to be followed is our map- We can follow the map to a tee one day and totally get of course another. If we get off course we have that map to allow us to get back on track. I think that some of the best learning happens by chance and I love when those moments occur- Life is not always ideal but if we know where we are suppose to be going it's hard to get lost along the way!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Leslie - it seems as though you have such a great grasp on special education! :) Well, I know you do, since we used to work together!!! HE HE! Hope you are doing well. I wanted to comment on your last statement "Life is not always ideal, but if we know where we are supposed to be going, it's hard to get lost along the way." I love this. How true. I think that is what curriculum should truly be, a way to GUIDE us on our journey, not decide what our journey will be.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks- former teaching buddy! I am doing well and it seems that you are too!!!!:) Thanks for your positive comment on my quote, I was having a philosophical moment- lol! I am so glad that you are taking this class, gives us an opportunity to catch up.

    ReplyDelete